Interweave Implementation Guide
0.1.0 - ci-build

Interweave Implementation Guide - Local Development build (v0.1.0). See the Directory of published versions

Resource Profile: InterweaveSocialCareSupportReason - Detailed Descriptions

Active as of 2024-06-10

Definitions for the Interweave-SocialCareSupportReason resource profile.

Guidance on how to interpret the contents of this table can be found here.

1. Condition
2. Condition.id
Must Supporttrue
3. Condition.meta
Control0..?
4. Condition.meta.versionId
Control0..?
Must Supporttrue
5. Condition.meta.lastUpdated
Control0..?
Must Supporttrue
6. Condition.meta.profile
Control0..?
Must Supporttrue
7. Condition.meta.security
Control0..?
8. Condition.meta.tag
Control0..?
SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.meta.tag. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ system
9. Condition.meta.tag:Source
SliceNameSource
Control0..1
Must Supporttrue
10. Condition.meta.tag:Source.system
Control1..?
Fixed Valuehttps://yhcr.nhs.uk/Source
11. Condition.meta.tag:Source.code
Control1..?
Must Supporttrue
12. Condition.meta.tag:Source.display
Control1..?
Must Supporttrue
13. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance
SliceNameProvenance
Control0..1
Must Supporttrue
14. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.system
Control1..?
Fixed Valuehttps://yhcr.nhs.uk/Provenance
15. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.code
Control1..?
Must Supporttrue
16. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.display
Control1..?
Must Supporttrue
17. Condition.implicitRules
18. Condition.language
19. Condition.text
20. Condition.extension
Control10..*
21. Condition.extension:episodisity
SliceNameepisodisity
Control0..0*
22. Condition.extension:primarySupportReason
SliceNameprimarySupportReason
Control0..1
TypeExtension(ExtensionInterweaveSocialCarePrimarySupportReason) (Extension Type: boolean)
Must Supporttrue
23. Condition.extension:supportReasonPeriod
SliceNamesupportReasonPeriod
Control1..1
TypeExtension(ExtensionInterweaveSocialCareSupportReasonPeriod) (Extension Type: Period)
Must Supporttrue
24. Condition.identifier
NoteThis is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion)
SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.identifier. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ system
25. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier
SliceNamelocalIdentifier
NoteThis is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion)
Control0..1
26. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.system
Control0..?
Must Supporttrue
Fixed Valuehttps://fhir.yhcr.nhs.uk/Id/local-socialcaresupportreasoncondition-identifier
27. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.value
Control0..?
Must Supporttrue
28. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.period
Control0..0
29. Condition.clinicalStatus
Control10..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Interweave Social Care Support Reason Clinical StatusThe codes SHALL be taken from Condition Clinical Status Codes
Must Supporttrue
30. Condition.category
Control10..1*
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Interweave Social Care Support Reason CategoryThe codes SHALL be taken from Care Connect Condition Category; other codes may be used where these codes are not suitable
Must Supporttrue
31. Condition.severity
Control0..01
32. Condition.code
Control10..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Interweave Social Care Support ReasonFor example codes, see Condition/Problem/Diagnosis Codes
Must Supporttrue
33. Condition.code.coding
34. Condition.code.coding.system
Control1..?
35. Condition.code.coding.code
Control1..?
36. Condition.code.coding.display
Control1..?
37. Condition.code.coding:snomedCT
SliceNamesnomedCT
Control0..01
38. Condition.bodySite
Control0..0*
39. Condition.subject
TypeReference(CareConnectPatient1|Group)
Must Supporttrue
40. Condition.subject.reference
Control1..?
41. Condition.subject.identifier
NoteThis is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion)
Control0..?
42. Condition.subject.display
Control1..?
43. Condition.context
Control0..01
44. Condition.onset[x]
Control0..01
[x] NoteSee Choice of Data Types for further information about how to use [x]
45. Condition.abatement[x]
Control0..01
[x] NoteSee Choice of Data Types for further information about how to use [x]
46. Condition.assertedDate
47. Condition.asserter
TypeReference(CareConnect-Practitioner-1|RelatedPerson|CareConnectPatient1)
48. Condition.stage
Control0..01
49. Condition.evidence
Control0..0*
50. Condition.note

Guidance on how to interpret the contents of this table can be found here.

1. Condition
Definition

A clinical condition, problem, diagnosis, or other event, situation, issue, or clinical concept that has risen to a level of concern.

Control0..*
InvariantsDefined on this element
con-3: Condition.clinicalStatus SHALL be present if verificationStatus is not entered-in-error (: verificationStatus='entered-in-error' or clinicalStatus.exists())
con-4: If condition is abated, then clinicalStatus must be either inactive, resolved, or remission (: abatement.empty() or (abatement as boolean).not() or clinicalStatus='resolved' or clinicalStatus='remission' or clinicalStatus='inactive')
dom-1: If the resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT contain any narrative (: contained.text.empty())
dom-2: If the resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT contain nested Resources (: contained.contained.empty())
dom-3: If the resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL be referred to from elsewhere in the resource (: contained.where(('#'+id in %resource.descendants().reference).not()).empty())
dom-4: If a resource is contained in another resource, it SHALL NOT have a meta.versionId or a meta.lastUpdated (: contained.meta.versionId.empty() and contained.meta.lastUpdated.empty())
2. Condition.id
Definition

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

Control0..1
Typeid
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation.

3. Condition.meta
Definition

The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content may not always be associated with version changes to the resource.

Control0..1
TypeMeta
Summarytrue
4. Condition.meta.versionId
Definition

The version specific identifier, as it appears in the version portion of the URL. This values changes when the resource is created, updated, or deleted.

Control0..1
Typeid
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

The server assigns this value, and ignores what the client specifies, except in the case that the server is imposing version integrity on updates/deletes.

5. Condition.meta.lastUpdated
Definition

When the resource last changed - e.g. when the version changed.

Control0..1
Typeinstant
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

This value is always populated except when the resource is first being created. The server / resource manager sets this value; what a client provides is irrelevant.

6. Condition.meta.profile
Definition

A list of profiles (references to StructureDefinition resources) that this resource claims to conform to. The URL is a reference to StructureDefinition.url.

Control0..*
Typeuri
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

It is up to the server and/or other infrastructure of policy to determine whether/how these claims are verified and/or updated over time. The list of profile URLs is a set.

7. Condition.meta.security
Definition

Security labels applied to this resource. These tags connect specific resources to the overall security policy and infrastructure.

Control0..*
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from All Security Labels; other codes may be used where these codes are not suitable

Security Labels from the Healthcare Privacy and Security Classification System.

TypeCoding
Summarytrue
Comments

The security labels can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource The list of security labels is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored.

8. Condition.meta.tag
Definition

Tags applied to this resource. Tags are intended to be used to identify and relate resources to process and workflow, and applications are not required to consider the tags when interpreting the meaning of a resource.

Control0..*
BindingFor example codes, see Common Tags

Codes that represent various types of tags, commonly workflow-related; e.g. "Needs review by Dr. Jones"

TypeCoding
Summarytrue
Comments

The tags can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of tags is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.meta.tag. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ system
9. Condition.meta.tag:Source
SliceNameSource
Definition

Tags applied to this resource. Tags are intended to be used to identify and relate resources to process and workflow, and applications are not required to consider the tags when interpreting the meaning of a resource.

Control0..1*
BindingFor example codes, see Common Tags

Codes that represent various types of tags, commonly workflow-related; e.g. "Needs review by Dr. Jones"

TypeCoding
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

The tags can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of tags is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored.

10. Condition.meta.tag:Source.system
Definition

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Control10..1
Typeuri
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Comments

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should de-reference to some definition that establish the system clearly and unambiguously.

Fixed Valuehttps://yhcr.nhs.uk/Source
11. Condition.meta.tag:Source.code
Definition

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Control10..1
Typecode
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

12. Condition.meta.tag:Source.display
Definition

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Control10..1
Typestring
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

13. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance
SliceNameProvenance
Definition

Tags applied to this resource. Tags are intended to be used to identify and relate resources to process and workflow, and applications are not required to consider the tags when interpreting the meaning of a resource.

Control0..1*
BindingFor example codes, see Common Tags

Codes that represent various types of tags, commonly workflow-related; e.g. "Needs review by Dr. Jones"

TypeCoding
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

The tags can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of tags is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored.

14. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.system
Definition

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Control10..1
Typeuri
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Comments

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should de-reference to some definition that establish the system clearly and unambiguously.

Fixed Valuehttps://yhcr.nhs.uk/Provenance
15. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.code
Definition

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Control10..1
Typecode
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

16. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.display
Definition

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Control10..1
Typestring
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

17. Condition.implicitRules
Definition

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content.

Control0..1
Typeuri
Is Modifiertrue
Summarytrue
Comments

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element.

This element is labelled as a modifier because the implicit rules may provide additional knowledge about the resource that modifies it's meaning or interpretation.

18. Condition.language
Definition

The base language in which the resource is written.

Control0..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Common Languages; other codes may be used where these codes are not suitable

A human language.

Additional BindingsPurpose
AllLanguagesMax Binding
Typecode
Comments

Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).

19. Condition.text
Definition

A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource, and may be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

Control0..1 This element is affected by the following invariants: dom-1
TypeNarrative
Alternate Namesnarrative, html, xhtml, display
Comments

Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded in formation is added later.

20. Condition.extension
Definition

An Extension

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control10..*
TypeExtension
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
21. Condition.extension:episodisity
SliceNameepisodisity
Definition

Episodicity of condition.

Control0..0 This element is affected by the following invariants: ele-1
TypeExtension(Extension-CareConnect-ConditionEpisode-1) (Extension Type: code)
InvariantsDefined on this element
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (: hasValue() | (children().count() > id.count()))
ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both (: extension.exists() != value.exists())
22. Condition.extension:primarySupportReason
SliceNameprimarySupportReason
Definition

Flag to indicate whether this is the primary support reason

Control0..1
TypeExtension(ExtensionInterweaveSocialCarePrimarySupportReason) (Extension Type: boolean)
Must Supporttrue
23. Condition.extension:supportReasonPeriod
SliceNamesupportReasonPeriod
Definition

The period during which the person received support for this support reason.

Control1..1
TypeExtension(ExtensionInterweaveSocialCareSupportReasonPeriod) (Extension Type: Period)
Must Supporttrue
24. Condition.modifierExtension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource, and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Is Modifiertrue
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

25. Condition.identifier
Definition

This records identifiers associated with this condition that are defined by business processes and/or used to refer to it when a direct URL reference to the resource itself is not appropriate (e.g. in CDA documents, or in written / printed documentation).

NoteThis is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion)
Control0..*
TypeIdentifier
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to allow connection to a wider workflow.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.identifier. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ system
26. Condition.identifier.use
Definition

The purpose of this identifier.

Control0..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from IdentifierUse

Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known .

Typecode
Is Modifiertrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers.

Comments

This is labeled as "Is Modifier" because applications should not mistake a temporary id for a permanent one. Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary.

27. Condition.identifier.system
Definition

Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.

Control10..1
Typeuri
Summarytrue
Requirements

There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.

Example
General:http://www.acme.com/identifiers/patient
28. Condition.identifier.value
Definition

The portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system.

Control10..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Comments

If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension.

Example
General:123456
29. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier
SliceNamelocalIdentifier
Definition

This records identifiers associated with this condition that are defined by business processes and/or used to refer to it when a direct URL reference to the resource itself is not appropriate (e.g. in CDA documents, or in written / printed documentation).

NoteThis is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion)
Control0..1*
TypeIdentifier
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to allow connection to a wider workflow.

30. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.use
Definition

The purpose of this identifier.

Control0..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from IdentifierUse

Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known .

Typecode
Is Modifiertrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers.

Comments

This is labeled as "Is Modifier" because applications should not mistake a temporary id for a permanent one. Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary.

31. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.system
Definition

Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.

Control10..1
Typeuri
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.

Fixed Valuehttps://fhir.yhcr.nhs.uk/Id/local-socialcaresupportreasoncondition-identifier
Example
General:http://www.acme.com/identifiers/patient
32. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.value
Definition

The portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system.

Control10..1
Typestring
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension.

Example
General:123456
33. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.period
Definition

Time period during which identifier is/was valid for use.

Control0..01
TypePeriod
Summarytrue
34. Condition.clinicalStatus
Definition

The clinical status of the condition.

Control10..1 This element is affected by the following invariants: con-3, con-4
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Interweave Social Care Support Reason Clinical StatusThe codes SHALL be taken from Condition Clinical Status Codes
Typecode
Is Modifiertrue
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

This element is labeled as a modifier because the status contains codes that mark the condition as not currently valid or of concern.

35. Condition.verificationStatus
Definition

The verification status to support the clinical status of the condition.

Control0..01 This element is affected by the following invariants: con-3
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from ConditionVerificationStatus

The verification status to support or decline the clinical status of the condition or diagnosis.

Typecode
Is Modifiertrue
Summarytrue
Comments

verificationStatus is not required. For example, when a patient has abdominal pain in the ED, there is not likely going to be a verification status.

This element is labeled as a modifier because the status contains the code refuted and entered-in-error that mark the Condition as not currently valid.

Default Valueunknown
36. Condition.category
Definition

A category assigned to the condition.

Control10..1*
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Interweave Social Care Support Reason CategoryFor example codes, see Condition Category Codes
TypeCodeableConcept
Must Supporttrue
Comments

The categorization is often highly contextual and may appear poorly differentiated or not very useful in other contexts.

37. Condition.severity
Definition

A subjective assessment of the severity of the condition as evaluated by the clinician.

Control0..01
BindingThe codes SHOULD be taken from Condition/Diagnosis Severity

A subjective assessment of the severity of the condition as evaluated by the clinician.

TypeCodeableConcept
Comments

Coding of the severity with a terminology is preferred, where possible.

38. Condition.code
Definition

Identification of the condition, problem or diagnosis.

Control10..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Interweave Social Care Support ReasonFor example codes, see Condition/Problem/Diagnosis Codes
TypeCodeableConcept
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

0..1 to account for primarily narrative only resources.

Alternate Namestype
39. Condition.code.coding
Definition

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Control0..*
TypeCoding
Summarytrue
Requirements

Allows for translations and alternate encodings within a code system. Also supports communication of the same instance to systems requiring different encodings.

Comments

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.code.coding. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ system
40. Condition.code.coding.system
Definition

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Control10..1
Typeuri
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Comments

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should de-reference to some definition that establish the system clearly and unambiguously.

41. Condition.code.coding.code
Definition

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Control10..1
Typecode
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

42. Condition.code.coding.display
Definition

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Control10..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

43. Condition.code.coding:snomedCT
SliceNamesnomedCT
Definition

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Control0..0*
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Care Connect Condition CodeFor codes, see (unbound) A code from the SNOMED Clinical Terminology U
TypeCoding
Summarytrue
Requirements

Allows for translations and alternate encodings within a code system. Also supports communication of the same instance to systems requiring different encodings.

Comments

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

44. Condition.bodySite
Definition

The anatomical location where this condition manifests itself.

Control0..0*
BindingFor example codes, see SNOMED CT Body Structures

Codes describing anatomical locations. May include laterality.

TypeCodeableConcept
Summarytrue
Comments

Only used if not implicit in code found in Condition.code. If the use case requires attributes from the BodySite resource (e.g. to identify and track separately) then use the standard extension body-site-instance. May be a summary code, or a reference to a very precise definition of the location, or both.

45. Condition.subject
Definition

Indicates the patient or group who the condition record is associated with.

Control1..1
TypeReference(CareConnectPatient1|Patient|Group)
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Group is typically used for veterinary or public health use cases.

Alternate Namespatient
46. Condition.subject.reference
Definition

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Control10..1 This element is affected by the following invariants: ref-1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Comments

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

47. Condition.subject.identifier
Definition

An identifier for the other resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.

NoteThis is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion)
Control0..1
TypeIdentifier
Summarytrue
Comments

When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy.

When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference

Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it.

48. Condition.subject.display
Definition

Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.

Control10..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Comments

This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.

49. Condition.context
Definition

Encounter during which the condition was first asserted.

Control0..01
TypeReference(EpisodeOfCare|CareConnect-Encounter-1|Encounter)
Summarytrue
Alternate Namesencounter
Comments

This record indicates the encounter this particular record is associated with. In the case of a "new" diagnosis reflecting ongoing/revised information about the condition, this might be distinct from the first encounter in which the underlying condition was first "known".

50. Condition.onset[x]
Definition

Estimated or actual date or date-time the condition began, in the opinion of the clinician.

Control0..01
TypeChoice of: dateTime, Age, Period, Range, string
[x] NoteSee Choice of Data Types for further information about how to use [x]
Summarytrue
Comments

Age is generally used when the patient reports an age at which the Condition began to occur.

51. Condition.abatement[x]
Definition

The date or estimated date that the condition resolved or went into remission. This is called "abatement" because of the many overloaded connotations associated with "remission" or "resolution" - Conditions are never really resolved, but they can abate.

Control0..01 This element is affected by the following invariants: con-4
TypeChoice of: dateTime, Age, boolean, Period, Range, string
[x] NoteSee Choice of Data Types for further information about how to use [x]
Comments

There is no explicit distinction between resolution and remission because in many cases the distinction is not clear. Age is generally used when the patient reports an age at which the Condition abated. If there is no abatement element, it is unknown whether the condition has resolved or entered remission; applications and users should generally assume that the condition is still valid. When abatementString exists, it implies the condition is abated.

52. Condition.assertedDate
Definition

The date on which the existance of the Condition was first asserted or acknowledged.

Control0..1
TypedateTime
Summarytrue
Comments

The assertedDate represents the date when this particular Condition record was created in the EHR, not the date of the most recent update in terms of when severity, abatement, etc. were specified.  The date of the last record modification can be retrieved from the resource metadata.

53. Condition.asserter
Definition

Individual who is making the condition statement.

Control0..1
TypeReference(CareConnect-Practitioner-1|Practitioner|Patient|RelatedPerson)
Summarytrue
54. Condition.stage
Definition

Clinical stage or grade of a condition. May include formal severity assessments.

Control0..01
TypeBackboneElement
InvariantsDefined on this element
con-1: Stage SHALL have summary or assessment (: summary.exists() or assessment.exists())
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (: hasValue() | (children().count() > id.count()))
55. Condition.evidence
Definition

Supporting Evidence / manifestations that are the basis on which this condition is suspected or confirmed.

Control0..0*
TypeBackboneElement
Comments

The evidence may be a simple list of coded symptoms/manifestations, or references to observations or formal assessments, or both.

InvariantsDefined on this element
con-2: evidence SHALL have code or details (: code.exists() or detail.exists())
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (: hasValue() | (children().count() > id.count()))
56. Condition.note
Definition

Additional information about the Condition. This is a general notes/comments entry for description of the Condition, its diagnosis and prognosis.

Control0..*
TypeAnnotation
57. Condition.note.text
Definition

The text of the annotation.

Control1..1
Typestring

Guidance on how to interpret the contents of this table can be found here.

1. Condition
Definition

A clinical condition, problem, diagnosis, or other event, situation, issue, or clinical concept that has risen to a level of concern.

Control0..*
2. Condition.id
Definition

The logical id of the resource, as used in the URL for the resource. Once assigned, this value never changes.

Control0..1
Typeid
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

The only time that a resource does not have an id is when it is being submitted to the server using a create operation.

3. Condition.meta
Definition

The metadata about the resource. This is content that is maintained by the infrastructure. Changes to the content may not always be associated with version changes to the resource.

Control0..1
TypeMeta
Summarytrue
4. Condition.meta.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

Control0..1
Typestring
XML RepresentationIn the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute.
5. Condition.meta.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.meta.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
6. Condition.meta.versionId
Definition

The version specific identifier, as it appears in the version portion of the URL. This values changes when the resource is created, updated, or deleted.

Control0..1
Typeid
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

The server assigns this value, and ignores what the client specifies, except in the case that the server is imposing version integrity on updates/deletes.

7. Condition.meta.lastUpdated
Definition

When the resource last changed - e.g. when the version changed.

Control0..1
Typeinstant
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

This value is always populated except when the resource is first being created. The server / resource manager sets this value; what a client provides is irrelevant.

8. Condition.meta.profile
Definition

A list of profiles (references to StructureDefinition resources) that this resource claims to conform to. The URL is a reference to StructureDefinition.url.

Control0..*
Typeuri
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

It is up to the server and/or other infrastructure of policy to determine whether/how these claims are verified and/or updated over time. The list of profile URLs is a set.

9. Condition.meta.security
Definition

Security labels applied to this resource. These tags connect specific resources to the overall security policy and infrastructure.

Control0..*
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from All Security Labels; other codes may be used where these codes are not suitable Security Labels from the Healthcare Privacy and Security Classification System
TypeCoding
Summarytrue
Comments

The security labels can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource The list of security labels is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored.

10. Condition.meta.tag
Definition

Tags applied to this resource. Tags are intended to be used to identify and relate resources to process and workflow, and applications are not required to consider the tags when interpreting the meaning of a resource.

Control0..*
BindingFor example codes, see Common Tags Codes that represent various types of tags, commonly workflow-related; e.g. "Needs review by Dr. Jones
TypeCoding
Summarytrue
Comments

The tags can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of tags is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.meta.tag. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ system
11. Condition.meta.tag:Source
SliceNameSource
Definition

Tags applied to this resource. Tags are intended to be used to identify and relate resources to process and workflow, and applications are not required to consider the tags when interpreting the meaning of a resource.

Control0..1
BindingFor example codes, see Common Tags Codes that represent various types of tags, commonly workflow-related; e.g. "Needs review by Dr. Jones
TypeCoding
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

The tags can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of tags is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored.

12. Condition.meta.tag:Source.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

Control0..1
Typestring
XML RepresentationIn the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute.
13. Condition.meta.tag:Source.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.meta.tag.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
14. Condition.meta.tag:Source.system
Definition

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Control1..1
Typeuri
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Comments

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should de-reference to some definition that establish the system clearly and unambiguously.

Fixed Valuehttps://yhcr.nhs.uk/Source
15. Condition.meta.tag:Source.version
Definition

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured. and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

NoteThis is a business versionId, not a resource version id (see discussion)
Control0..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Comments

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

16. Condition.meta.tag:Source.code
Definition

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Control1..1
Typecode
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

17. Condition.meta.tag:Source.display
Definition

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Control1..1
Typestring
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

18. Condition.meta.tag:Source.userSelected
Definition

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - i.e. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Control0..1
Typeboolean
Summarytrue
Requirements

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Comments

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

19. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance
SliceNameProvenance
Definition

Tags applied to this resource. Tags are intended to be used to identify and relate resources to process and workflow, and applications are not required to consider the tags when interpreting the meaning of a resource.

Control0..1
BindingFor example codes, see Common Tags Codes that represent various types of tags, commonly workflow-related; e.g. "Needs review by Dr. Jones
TypeCoding
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

The tags can be updated without changing the stated version of the resource. The list of tags is a set. Uniqueness is based the system/code, and version and display are ignored.

20. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

Control0..1
Typestring
XML RepresentationIn the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute.
21. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.meta.tag.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
22. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.system
Definition

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Control1..1
Typeuri
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Comments

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should de-reference to some definition that establish the system clearly and unambiguously.

Fixed Valuehttps://yhcr.nhs.uk/Provenance
23. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.version
Definition

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured. and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

NoteThis is a business versionId, not a resource version id (see discussion)
Control0..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Comments

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

24. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.code
Definition

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Control1..1
Typecode
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

25. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.display
Definition

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Control1..1
Typestring
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

26. Condition.meta.tag:Provenance.userSelected
Definition

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - i.e. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Control0..1
Typeboolean
Summarytrue
Requirements

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Comments

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

27. Condition.implicitRules
Definition

A reference to a set of rules that were followed when the resource was constructed, and which must be understood when processing the content.

Control0..1
Typeuri
Is Modifiertrue
Summarytrue
Comments

Asserting this rule set restricts the content to be only understood by a limited set of trading partners. This inherently limits the usefulness of the data in the long term. However, the existing health eco-system is highly fractured, and not yet ready to define, collect, and exchange data in a generally computable sense. Wherever possible, implementers and/or specification writers should avoid using this element.

This element is labelled as a modifier because the implicit rules may provide additional knowledge about the resource that modifies it's meaning or interpretation.

28. Condition.language
Definition

The base language in which the resource is written.

Control0..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Common Languages; other codes may be used where these codes are not suitable A human language
Additional BindingsPurpose
AllLanguagesMax Binding
Typecode
Comments

Language is provided to support indexing and accessibility (typically, services such as text to speech use the language tag). The html language tag in the narrative applies to the narrative. The language tag on the resource may be used to specify the language of other presentations generated from the data in the resource Not all the content has to be in the base language. The Resource.language should not be assumed to apply to the narrative automatically. If a language is specified, it should it also be specified on the div element in the html (see rules in HTML5 for information about the relationship between xml:lang and the html lang attribute).

29. Condition.text
Definition

A human-readable narrative that contains a summary of the resource, and may be used to represent the content of the resource to a human. The narrative need not encode all the structured data, but is required to contain sufficient detail to make it "clinically safe" for a human to just read the narrative. Resource definitions may define what content should be represented in the narrative to ensure clinical safety.

Control0..1 This element is affected by the following invariants: dom-1
TypeNarrative
Alternate Namesnarrative, html, xhtml, display
Comments

Contained resources do not have narrative. Resources that are not contained SHOULD have a narrative. In some cases, a resource may only have text with little or no additional discrete data (as long as all minOccurs=1 elements are satisfied). This may be necessary for data from legacy systems where information is captured as a "text blob" or where text is additionally entered raw or narrated and encoded in formation is added later.

30. Condition.contained
Definition

These resources do not have an independent existence apart from the resource that contains them - they cannot be identified independently, and nor can they have their own independent transaction scope.

Control0..*
TypeResource
Alternate Namesinline resources, anonymous resources, contained resources
Comments

This should never be done when the content can be identified properly, as once identification is lost, it is extremely difficult (and context dependent) to restore it again.

31. Condition.extension
Definition

An Extension

Control1..*
TypeExtension
SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
32. Condition.extension:episodisity
SliceNameepisodisity
Definition

Episodicity of condition.

Control0..0 This element is affected by the following invariants: ele-1
TypeExtension(Extension-CareConnect-ConditionEpisode-1) (Extension Type: code)
InvariantsDefined on this element
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (: hasValue() | (children().count() > id.count()))
ext-1: Must have either extensions or value[x], not both (: extension.exists() != value.exists())
33. Condition.extension:primarySupportReason
SliceNameprimarySupportReason
Definition

Flag to indicate whether this is the primary support reason

Control0..1
TypeExtension(ExtensionInterweaveSocialCarePrimarySupportReason) (Extension Type: boolean)
Must Supporttrue
34. Condition.extension:supportReasonPeriod
SliceNamesupportReasonPeriod
Definition

The period during which the person received support for this support reason.

Control1..1
TypeExtension(ExtensionInterweaveSocialCareSupportReasonPeriod) (Extension Type: Period)
Must Supporttrue
35. Condition.modifierExtension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource, and that modifies the understanding of the element that contains it. Usually modifier elements provide negation or qualification. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension. Applications processing a resource are required to check for modifier extensions.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Is Modifiertrue
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

36. Condition.identifier
Definition

This records identifiers associated with this condition that are defined by business processes and/or used to refer to it when a direct URL reference to the resource itself is not appropriate (e.g. in CDA documents, or in written / printed documentation).

NoteThis is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion)
Control0..*
TypeIdentifier
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to allow connection to a wider workflow.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.identifier. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ system
37. Condition.identifier.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

Control0..1
Typestring
XML RepresentationIn the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute.
38. Condition.identifier.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.identifier.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
39. Condition.identifier.use
Definition

The purpose of this identifier.

Control0..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from IdentifierUse Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known
Typecode
Is Modifiertrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers.

Comments

This is labeled as "Is Modifier" because applications should not mistake a temporary id for a permanent one. Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary.

40. Condition.identifier.type
Definition

A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

Control0..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Identifier Type Codes; other codes may be used where these codes are not suitable A coded type for an identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose
TypeCodeableConcept
Summarytrue
Requirements

Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.

Comments

This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage.

Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.

41. Condition.identifier.system
Definition

Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.

Control1..1
Typeuri
Summarytrue
Requirements

There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.

Example
General:http://www.acme.com/identifiers/patient
42. Condition.identifier.value
Definition

The portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system.

Control1..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Comments

If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension.

Example
General:123456
43. Condition.identifier.period
Definition

Time period during which identifier is/was valid for use.

Control0..1
TypePeriod
Summarytrue
44. Condition.identifier.assigner
Definition

Organization that issued/manages the identifier.

Control0..1
TypeReference(CareConnect-Organization-1)
Summarytrue
Comments

The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.

45. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier
SliceNamelocalIdentifier
Definition

This records identifiers associated with this condition that are defined by business processes and/or used to refer to it when a direct URL reference to the resource itself is not appropriate (e.g. in CDA documents, or in written / printed documentation).

NoteThis is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion)
Control0..1
TypeIdentifier
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to allow connection to a wider workflow.

46. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

Control0..1
Typestring
XML RepresentationIn the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute.
47. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.identifier.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
48. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.use
Definition

The purpose of this identifier.

Control0..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from IdentifierUse Identifies the purpose for this identifier, if known
Typecode
Is Modifiertrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Allows the appropriate identifier for a particular context of use to be selected from among a set of identifiers.

Comments

This is labeled as "Is Modifier" because applications should not mistake a temporary id for a permanent one. Applications can assume that an identifier is permanent unless it explicitly says that it is temporary.

49. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.type
Definition

A coded type for the identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose.

Control0..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Identifier Type Codes; other codes may be used where these codes are not suitable A coded type for an identifier that can be used to determine which identifier to use for a specific purpose
TypeCodeableConcept
Summarytrue
Requirements

Allows users to make use of identifiers when the identifier system is not known.

Comments

This element deals only with general categories of identifiers. It SHOULD not be used for codes that correspond 1..1 with the Identifier.system. Some identifiers may fall into multiple categories due to common usage.

Where the system is known, a type is unnecessary because the type is always part of the system definition. However systems often need to handle identifiers where the system is not known. There is not a 1:1 relationship between type and system, since many different systems have the same type.

50. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.system
Definition

Establishes the namespace for the value - that is, a URL that describes a set values that are unique.

Control1..1
Typeuri
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

There are many sets of identifiers. To perform matching of two identifiers, we need to know what set we're dealing with. The system identifies a particular set of unique identifiers.

Fixed Valuehttps://fhir.yhcr.nhs.uk/Id/local-socialcaresupportreasoncondition-identifier
Example
General:http://www.acme.com/identifiers/patient
51. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.value
Definition

The portion of the identifier typically relevant to the user and which is unique within the context of the system.

Control1..1
Typestring
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

If the value is a full URI, then the system SHALL be urn:ietf:rfc:3986. The value's primary purpose is computational mapping. As a result, it may be normalized for comparison purposes (e.g. removing non-significant whitespace, dashes, etc.) A value formatted for human display can be conveyed using the Rendered Value extension.

Example
General:123456
52. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.period
Definition

Time period during which identifier is/was valid for use.

Control0..0
TypePeriod
Summarytrue
53. Condition.identifier:localIdentifier.assigner
Definition

Organization that issued/manages the identifier.

Control0..1
TypeReference(CareConnect-Organization-1)
Summarytrue
Comments

The Identifier.assigner may omit the .reference element and only contain a .display element reflecting the name or other textual information about the assigning organization.

54. Condition.clinicalStatus
Definition

The clinical status of the condition.

Control1..1 This element is affected by the following invariants: con-3, con-4
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Interweave Social Care Support Reason Clinical Status
Typecode
Is Modifiertrue
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Comments

This element is labeled as a modifier because the status contains codes that mark the condition as not currently valid or of concern.

55. Condition.verificationStatus
Definition

The verification status to support the clinical status of the condition.

Control0..0 This element is affected by the following invariants: con-3
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from ConditionVerificationStatus The verification status to support or decline the clinical status of the condition or diagnosis
Typecode
Is Modifiertrue
Summarytrue
Comments

verificationStatus is not required. For example, when a patient has abdominal pain in the ED, there is not likely going to be a verification status.

This element is labeled as a modifier because the status contains the code refuted and entered-in-error that mark the Condition as not currently valid.

Default Valueunknown
56. Condition.category
Definition

A category assigned to the condition.

Control1..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Interweave Social Care Support Reason Category
TypeCodeableConcept
Must Supporttrue
Comments

The categorization is often highly contextual and may appear poorly differentiated or not very useful in other contexts.

57. Condition.category.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

Control0..1
Typestring
XML RepresentationIn the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute.
58. Condition.category.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.category.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
59. Condition.category.coding
Definition

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Control0..*
TypeCoding
Summarytrue
Requirements

Allows for translations and alternate encodings within a code system. Also supports communication of the same instance to systems requiring different encodings.

Comments

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

60. Condition.category.coding.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

Control0..1
Typestring
XML RepresentationIn the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute.
61. Condition.category.coding.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.category.coding.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
62. Condition.category.coding.system
Definition

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Control1..1
Typeuri
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Comments

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should de-reference to some definition that establish the system clearly and unambiguously.

63. Condition.category.coding.version
Definition

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured. and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

NoteThis is a business versionId, not a resource version id (see discussion)
Control0..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Comments

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

64. Condition.category.coding.code
Definition

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Control1..1
Typecode
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

65. Condition.category.coding.display
Definition

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Control1..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

66. Condition.category.coding.userSelected
Definition

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - i.e. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Control0..1
Typeboolean
Summarytrue
Requirements

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Comments

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

67. Condition.category.text
Definition

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

Control0..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Requirements

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Comments

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

68. Condition.severity
Definition

A subjective assessment of the severity of the condition as evaluated by the clinician.

Control0..0
BindingThe codes SHOULD be taken from Condition/Diagnosis Severity A subjective assessment of the severity of the condition as evaluated by the clinician
TypeCodeableConcept
Comments

Coding of the severity with a terminology is preferred, where possible.

69. Condition.code
Definition

Identification of the condition, problem or diagnosis.

Control1..1
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Interweave Social Care Support Reason
TypeCodeableConcept
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

0..1 to account for primarily narrative only resources.

Alternate Namestype
70. Condition.code.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

Control0..1
Typestring
XML RepresentationIn the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute.
71. Condition.code.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.code.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
72. Condition.code.coding
Definition

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Control0..*
TypeCoding
Summarytrue
Requirements

Allows for translations and alternate encodings within a code system. Also supports communication of the same instance to systems requiring different encodings.

Comments

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.code.coding. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ system
73. Condition.code.coding.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

Control0..1
Typestring
XML RepresentationIn the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute.
74. Condition.code.coding.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.code.coding.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
75. Condition.code.coding.system
Definition

The identification of the code system that defines the meaning of the symbol in the code.

Control1..1
Typeuri
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be unambiguous about the source of the definition of the symbol.

Comments

The URI may be an OID (urn:oid:...) or a UUID (urn:uuid:...). OIDs and UUIDs SHALL be references to the HL7 OID registry. Otherwise, the URI should come from HL7's list of FHIR defined special URIs or it should de-reference to some definition that establish the system clearly and unambiguously.

76. Condition.code.coding.version
Definition

The version of the code system which was used when choosing this code. Note that a well-maintained code system does not need the version reported, because the meaning of codes is consistent across versions. However this cannot consistently be assured. and when the meaning is not guaranteed to be consistent, the version SHOULD be exchanged.

NoteThis is a business versionId, not a resource version id (see discussion)
Control0..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Comments

Where the terminology does not clearly define what string should be used to identify code system versions, the recommendation is to use the date (expressed in FHIR date format) on which that version was officially published as the version date.

77. Condition.code.coding.code
Definition

A symbol in syntax defined by the system. The symbol may be a predefined code or an expression in a syntax defined by the coding system (e.g. post-coordination).

Control1..1
Typecode
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to refer to a particular code in the system.

78. Condition.code.coding.display
Definition

A representation of the meaning of the code in the system, following the rules of the system.

Control1..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Requirements

Need to be able to carry a human-readable meaning of the code for readers that do not know the system.

79. Condition.code.coding.userSelected
Definition

Indicates that this coding was chosen by a user directly - i.e. off a pick list of available items (codes or displays).

Control0..1
Typeboolean
Summarytrue
Requirements

This has been identified as a clinical safety criterium - that this exact system/code pair was chosen explicitly, rather than inferred by the system based on some rules or language processing.

Comments

Amongst a set of alternatives, a directly chosen code is the most appropriate starting point for new translations. There is some ambiguity about what exactly 'directly chosen' implies, and trading partner agreement may be needed to clarify the use of this element and its consequences more completely.

80. Condition.code.coding:snomedCT
SliceNamesnomedCT
Definition

A reference to a code defined by a terminology system.

Control0..0
BindingThe codes SHALL be taken from Care Connect Condition Code A code from the SNOMED Clinical Terminology U
TypeCoding
Summarytrue
Requirements

Allows for translations and alternate encodings within a code system. Also supports communication of the same instance to systems requiring different encodings.

Comments

Codes may be defined very casually in enumerations, or code lists, up to very formal definitions such as SNOMED CT - see the HL7 v3 Core Principles for more information. Ordering of codings is undefined and SHALL NOT be used to infer meaning. Generally, at most only one of the coding values will be labeled as UserSelected = true.

81. Condition.code.text
Definition

A human language representation of the concept as seen/selected/uttered by the user who entered the data and/or which represents the intended meaning of the user.

Control0..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Requirements

The codes from the terminologies do not always capture the correct meaning with all the nuances of the human using them, or sometimes there is no appropriate code at all. In these cases, the text is used to capture the full meaning of the source.

Comments

Very often the text is the same as a displayName of one of the codings.

82. Condition.bodySite
Definition

The anatomical location where this condition manifests itself.

Control0..0
BindingFor example codes, see SNOMED CT Body Structures Codes describing anatomical locations. May include laterality
TypeCodeableConcept
Summarytrue
Comments

Only used if not implicit in code found in Condition.code. If the use case requires attributes from the BodySite resource (e.g. to identify and track separately) then use the standard extension body-site-instance. May be a summary code, or a reference to a very precise definition of the location, or both.

83. Condition.subject
Definition

Indicates the patient or group who the condition record is associated with.

Control1..1
TypeReference(CareConnectPatient1)
Must Supporttrue
Summarytrue
Requirements

Group is typically used for veterinary or public health use cases.

Alternate Namespatient
84. Condition.subject.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

Control0..1
Typestring
XML RepresentationIn the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute.
85. Condition.subject.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.subject.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
86. Condition.subject.reference
Definition

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Control1..1 This element is affected by the following invariants: ref-1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Comments

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

87. Condition.subject.identifier
Definition

An identifier for the other resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.

NoteThis is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion)
Control0..1
TypeIdentifier
Summarytrue
Comments

When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy.

When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference

Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it.

88. Condition.subject.display
Definition

Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.

Control1..1
Typestring
Summarytrue
Comments

This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.

89. Condition.context
Definition

Encounter during which the condition was first asserted.

Control0..0
TypeReference(EpisodeOfCare|CareConnect-Encounter-1)
Summarytrue
Alternate Namesencounter
Comments

This record indicates the encounter this particular record is associated with. In the case of a "new" diagnosis reflecting ongoing/revised information about the condition, this might be distinct from the first encounter in which the underlying condition was first "known".

90. Condition.onset[x]
Definition

Estimated or actual date or date-time the condition began, in the opinion of the clinician.

Control0..0
TypeChoice of: dateTime, Age, Period, Range, string
[x] NoteSee Choice of Data Types for further information about how to use [x]
Summarytrue
Comments

Age is generally used when the patient reports an age at which the Condition began to occur.

91. Condition.abatement[x]
Definition

The date or estimated date that the condition resolved or went into remission. This is called "abatement" because of the many overloaded connotations associated with "remission" or "resolution" - Conditions are never really resolved, but they can abate.

Control0..0 This element is affected by the following invariants: con-4
TypeChoice of: dateTime, Age, boolean, Period, Range, string
[x] NoteSee Choice of Data Types for further information about how to use [x]
Comments

There is no explicit distinction between resolution and remission because in many cases the distinction is not clear. Age is generally used when the patient reports an age at which the Condition abated. If there is no abatement element, it is unknown whether the condition has resolved or entered remission; applications and users should generally assume that the condition is still valid. When abatementString exists, it implies the condition is abated.

92. Condition.assertedDate
Definition

The date on which the existance of the Condition was first asserted or acknowledged.

Control0..1
TypedateTime
Summarytrue
Comments

The assertedDate represents the date when this particular Condition record was created in the EHR, not the date of the most recent update in terms of when severity, abatement, etc. were specified.  The date of the last record modification can be retrieved from the resource metadata.

93. Condition.asserter
Definition

Individual who is making the condition statement.

Control0..1
TypeReference(CareConnect-Practitioner-1)
Summarytrue
94. Condition.stage
Definition

Clinical stage or grade of a condition. May include formal severity assessments.

Control0..0
TypeBackboneElement
InvariantsDefined on this element
con-1: Stage SHALL have summary or assessment (: summary.exists() or assessment.exists())
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (: hasValue() | (children().count() > id.count()))
95. Condition.evidence
Definition

Supporting Evidence / manifestations that are the basis on which this condition is suspected or confirmed.

Control0..0
TypeBackboneElement
Comments

The evidence may be a simple list of coded symptoms/manifestations, or references to observations or formal assessments, or both.

InvariantsDefined on this element
con-2: evidence SHALL have code or details (: code.exists() or detail.exists())
ele-1: All FHIR elements must have a @value or children (: hasValue() | (children().count() > id.count()))
96. Condition.note
Definition

Additional information about the Condition. This is a general notes/comments entry for description of the Condition, its diagnosis and prognosis.

Control0..*
TypeAnnotation
97. Condition.note.id
Definition

unique id for the element within a resource (for internal references). This may be any string value that does not contain spaces.

Control0..1
Typestring
XML RepresentationIn the XML format, this property is represented as an attribute.
98. Condition.note.extension
Definition

May be used to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the element. In order to make the use of extensions safe and manageable, there is a strict set of governance applied to the definition and use of extensions. Though any implementer is allowed to define an extension, there is a set of requirements that SHALL be met as part of the definition of the extension.

Control0..*
TypeExtension
Alternate Namesextensions, user content
Comments

There can be no stigma associated with the use of extensions by any application, project, or standard - regardless of the institution or jurisdiction that uses or defines the extensions. The use of extensions is what allows the FHIR specification to retain a core level of simplicity for everyone.

SlicingThis element introduces a set of slices on Condition.note.extension. The slices are unordered and Open, and can be differentiated using the following discriminators:
  • value @ url
99. Condition.note.author[x]
Definition

The individual responsible for making the annotation.

Control0..1
TypeChoice of: Reference(RelatedPerson|CareConnect-Practitioner-1|CareConnectPatient1), string
[x] NoteSee Choice of Data Types for further information about how to use [x]
Summarytrue
100. Condition.note.time
Definition

Indicates when this particular annotation was made.

Control0..1
TypedateTime
Summarytrue
101. Condition.note.text
Definition

The text of the annotation.

Control1..1
Typestring